The Most Important Story This Political Season
Senator Bernie Sanders
The most important story of this 2016 political season has been ignored by the media; thus, your conscious awareness. The reason your media refuses to explicitly identify this story will become evident once I identify it. Like the vast majority of profound insights, once you are told about it, the reality of the truth in question becomes self-evident. Here is the headline that is more profound than any headline written this political season:
An Avowed Socialist is a Viable Candidate for President of the United States
Let that headline sink in for a moment. I know what you’re thinking: Senator Sanders doesn’t have a chance. Before you get too much solace from that denial ridden and self-comforting thought, you’re missing the point. Put aside your desire to soothe your jagged nerves and consider that for the FIRST TIME in American history, an avowed socialist is a VIABLE candidate for President of the United States.
How did we get here? Well, to begin with, Baby Boomers are no longer the largest demographic group in America. Baby Boomers began their adult lives as the love children, drug addled 60s generation. At least 40% of Baby Boomers lean left. But the real story is to be found in their children and grand children, i.e., the Millennial and Generation Y demographics.
Millennials favor avowed socialist Senator Bernie Sanders over progressive politician Hillary Clinton more than 2 to 1! That statistic, alone, is remarkable. But what gives that statistic teeth is that Millennials are now the LARGEST DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP in America.
According to a new study by the Harvard Institute of Politics, only 40% of likely voters between ages 18 and 29 want to see a Republican win the White House. 55% of Millennial voters say they would prefer a Democrat for President. Millennials have no problem accepting that an avowed socialist is also a Democrat. So how did a country conceived as a capitalist, merit based system of small government, evolve to the point where the largest voter demographic in America prefers a socialist, super-sized system of government, e.g., free college tuition, universal single payer healthcare, increased taxes and, by definition, a government controlled redistribution of all wealth?
Five years ago I wrote a book on how that happened. The book, The Progressive Virus: The Epidemic Infecting America, traced the metamorphosis of America and most of the western world from free market, small government to a mega socialist nanny state. Here is an analysis I included in that book:
“[A]las, this is where we find the universities
today, populated to a surprising degree by a
generation of bourgeois ideologists schooled in
the faddish Marxism of the sixties. These men and
women, who cut themselves adrift from the
common culture and traditional beliefs, have
taken the reins of power in the schools and are
now laboring to transform the basic structures of
society from the bottom up. In this, I’m reminded
of the often-quoted boast of Norman Thomas, a
Princeton-educated Presbyterian minister and a
founding member of the ACLU who was defeated
six times in his bid for the White House on the
Socialist Party ticket. In 1952, no doubt, his words
provoked only laughter, but today they offer a
more somber warning. Thomas had once said in a
candid interview that, “The American people will
never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the
name of liberalism they will adopt every
fragment of the socialist program until one day
America will be a socialist nation without ever
knowing how it happened.” By 1970, both
Thomas and Gus Hall, the perennial candidate of
the Communist Party USA, gave up their quest for
the presidency because, as they said, the two
major parties had already adopted their
platforms. (Emphasis added)
The exact means by which the American Idea was turned on its head is a story of intrigue, the power of sophisticated psychological operations and a failed handoff of traditional values beginning with the post-WWII generation and ending with Generation Y. Historically, Americans were warned, more than once, in no uncertain terms, what America’s enemies had in store for them. Those warnings, including the warning you just read from Norman Thomas, were ignored by conservatives who used denial and dismissiveness to soothe their jagged nerves. Here is another example of the warnings I’m talking about. In the 1960s, then Premier of the USSR, Nikita Khrushchev said this:
"You Americans are so gullible. No, you won't accept Communism outright; but we'll keep feeding you small doses of Socialism until you will finally wake up and find that you already have Communism. We won't have to fight you; we'll so weaken your economy, until you fall like overripe fruit into our hands." 
The current author has written 3 books chronicling how the USSR and its subversion agents, along with American Marxist operatives, executed their plans to subvert the United States of America to a socialist conglomeration of states. The Progressive Virus; A Look Inside the Playbook and Shadow Men: An Encyclopedia of Mind Control.
It is one thing for Marxists to come up with a grand plan, it is quite another to devise a strategy and develop tactics that will bring that goal to fruition. The distance between point A (the general goal) and point Z, the point at which Millennials favor an avowed socialist to become the next president of the United States, is a study in intrigue, the likes of which would challenge Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and his famous crime sleuth, Sherlock Holmes.
My first book on the subject, The Progressive Virus, was a scholarly book that was intended to be a Sherlock Holme’s type inquiry into the cultural-revolution that has reshaped America. It is one thing to describe it, which is what 90% of all authors who have been interested in this subject have done. It is quite another to parse out and identify, in detail and with precision, how America became what Nikita Kruschvev and Norman Thomas, among others, promised it would become one day.
When “Virus” was originally written, the revolution that I chronicled in detail, was still considered to be a myth, if not outright conspiracy nonsense to most Americans. Jagged nerves are easily soothed using denial and dismissive attitudes. Few people in the west ever thought it would or even could actually happen. And among those who acknowledged that it COULD happen, they never imagined it would happen before the year 2050 or so. In fact, Comrade Andropov, the mastermind of Soviet psychological operations, thought it would take at least till the year 2035, and probably much longer, before his team of mind controllers and subversion artists could pull off the Fabian style coup e’etat of the Millennia: Turn the American idea on its head for a mega-government socialist union of states.
In 2008 a mixed race (white/black) young Senator who had made his name as a community organizer, by the name of Barack Obama was, along with his brain trusts and overseers, given the reins of power over the United States. From my perspective, the most important thing President Obama achieved during his eight-year term is that he made it almost impossible, for any reasonable person, to deny or dismiss that America was in the midst of a socialist cultural revolution. By the time he left office, if there was any doubt about all the things I wrote about in “Virus,” those doubts were erased by President Obama.
5 years ago I shared with my readers a study that portended what was to come. Here is what I wrote:
“In early 2012 professor of economics Jack Chambless had his
students at Valencia College, located in Orlando, Florida, write
an essay on the role of government in their lives. Chambless
reported the results of his study, which illustrate
the success that the likes of Bill Ayers and his wife have had on
‘I took the essays from three classes – about 180
students. About 10% of the students said they
wanted the government to leave them alone and
not tax them too much and let them regulate
their own lives. But over 80% of the students said
that the American dream to them meant a job, a
house, and plenty of money for retirement and
vacations and things like this. When it came to
the part about the federal government, eight out
of ten students said they wanted free health care,
they wanted the government to pay for their
tuition, they wanted the government to pay for
the down payment on their house, they expected
the government to, quote, “give them a job.”
Many of them said they wanted the government
to tax wealthier individuals so that they would
have an opportunity to have a better life.
What follows is a representative essay written by one of
professor Chambless’s students:
“As human beings, we are not really responsible
for our own acts, and so we need government to
control those who don’t care about others.’
These data suggest that traditional values are holding on by a
thread in the face of a widespread progressive epidemic.” 
I find it fascinating that in 2012 these Florida college students gave voice to what Senator Sanders has said all along in 2016 during his run for the Democratic nomination for President.
The question becomes this: What is it that Senator Sanders has tapped into that has made him the first avowed socialist to be a viable contender for President? The answer to that question may surprise you.
Napoleon Legal Consulting, Inc. has studied the content patterns of Senator Sander’s policy speeches. We studied 50 of Senator Sander’s speeches as broadcast on C-SPAN over the last year and a half. We looked for recurrent themes, ideas and word patterns. Without going into great detail, this is what we found were common themes.
Wealth disparity, e.g., 1% v the 99%
Wall Street Greed
The general notion of increasing entitlements for working people and the young, e.g., universal, single payer healthcare, free college tuition, higher minimum wage guarantees, increased taxes on the rich.
Here is what is surprising to many self-described conservatives, Senator Sander’s complaints about society, in general, are shared by socialists AND conservatives. Conservatives may disagree with Senator Sander’s solutions, but are in agreement with his criticisms of corporate greed, Wall Street’s revolving door between it and Washington, wealth disparities and greed.
For example, Senator Sanders tells his audience that the Walton family, owners of Walmart stores, has more wealth in their family than the lower 40% of all people in America. Senator Sanders goes on to say that the Walton family does not pay its employees a living wage, which means that thousands of Walmart employees must go on welfare and Medicaid in order to “make it.” And who pays for welfare and Medicaid? You pay, you pay for the Walton family’s stinginess and greed. The Senator then says this to his audience. He starts off by documenting that Goldman Sachs provides BOTH parties with men who served as Secretary of the Treasury. Senator Sanders documents that Goldman Sachs was fined $6 billion dollars for fraud, but no one at Goldman ever went to jail or, for that matter, not one banker ever went to jail the result of the financial collapse of 2008. He then follows with the fact that on the other hand, a young person arrested for possessing too much marijuana on his person will be arrested and will be likely convicted. This means he will have a criminal record for the rest of his life. On the other hand, bankers collapsed the economy, taxpayers then bailed them out, yet they get off Scott free.
Lloyd Blankfein, Head of Goldman Sachs
Keep in mind that focusing upon a candidate’s platform absent his/her supporter’s mindset is like clapping with one hand. Millennials were raised to be socialist thinkers since the time they were in Kindergarten, a fact documented in my scholarly studies. Senator Sanders has been saying the same thing for the past 25 years, but it took the Millennial generation coming on line as voters for the two ingredients (Senator Sanders and Millennial voters) to mix. And who are the Millennials? Before anyone else identified this demographic as a revolutionary group, I wrote the following about them:
“YOUNG AMERICANS JUST ENTERING the work force represent the end
result of over a quarter-century of progressive indoctrination.
These young men and women number approximately 80 million.
They were born between 1980 and 1995. Millennials were raised
to believe that they were all stars in the making.
Competition was tempered or non-existent for Millennials.
They played in little league baseball where there were no
winners or losers and everyone got a trophy at the end of the
season. Girls and boys were homogenized to the point where
any differences were presumed to be purely psychological, not
biological. It is a generation that found some parents raising
their children as gender neutral, that is, no his or hers, pink or
blue, trucks or dolls, dresses or pants, short or long hair.”
[M]illennials have been, since they were old enough to talk, treated as though their opinions on complex issues of life, death, economics and values are just
as valuable and meaningful as a 50 year-old war veteran with a
family who is signing the checks that pay for their lifestyle.
Millennials have lived in a self-indulgent world where the
only discipline they received, if you can call it discipline, was a
“time out” from their digital devices when they failed to
perform. They are, for the most part, adrift in a sea of nonattachment,
save for their “friends” on Facebook or other social
media. They not only have no allegiance to their country, they
are more likely to blame America first for any perceived inequity
in outcomes. Religion is likely to be perceived as myth and in its
place we find a blind adherence to the religion of the
environment and pure adoration for self.” 
It should be obvious that Senator Bernie Sanders and Millennial voters were made for one another, and both the Senator and Millennials are the end result of a premeditated and very sophisticated plot to turn the American idea on its head.
What follows are some excerpts from a book published under the name A Look Inside the Playbook: How Marxists Plan to Destroy America. This specific protocol was originally conceived as a blueprint to subvert America in the form of a Marxist training manual produced by the USSR and its American agents:
“It has been a little over a half century since our
movement set its sights on America. Over those 50 years we
have become more sophisticated in our efforts and we have
learned from our mistakes. We have been richly rewarded
for our patience and methodical approach to subverting our
enemy. As we begin the last leg of our revolution in this new
millennium, many of our enemy’s citizens have been
converted into our agents and operatives.
We have transformed America’s press into agencies
that would put to shame our Izvestia and Pravda of our
golden years back in the USSR. Our enemy’s children have
been “turned” and now represent one of our core
demographics. We have successfully fractured America into
competing groups; each estranged from the country that is
their home. Our once powerful enemy is unsure and insecure
about its history and traditions. We have inculcated shame
and promoted ignorance into America’s children such that
by the time they become adults they are ashamed of their
country while having little or no insight or knowledge about
the ways of the world. And they don’t even know what has
happened to them. Although we have made great strides, much work
needs to be done. This operations manual was designed to
provide our new comrades everything they need to continue
the subversion and eventual takeover of America. Our long
time comrades can also benefit and stay abreast of our latest
strategies and tactics by studying this manual. If you follow
the principles in this operations manual you will live to see
The United Socialist States of America.”
“[We] begin as we always begin, with great patience and a
plan. We must first attack our enemy’s nuclear family
structure because that is the framework within which they
pass down their traditional American values to their children
and all future generations. We will focus our assault upon their children
while they are away at school. Young minds are malleable and
vulnerable. We will have access to their children for six or
more hours per day, nine or more months out of the year.
America’s public schools will become our indoctrination
camps where child by child, mind by mind, we will chip
away at everything our enemy holds dear. We will not move
too quickly, for it is much easier to sneak up on your enemy
and kill him little by little than it is to attack everything he
stands for all at once.”
For those readers who will proudly continue using denial, rationalizations and dismissiveness in order to protect their jagged nerves from the truth of what has happened to the America they once knew, you need to know that you are, at the very least, partially responsible for the success of avowed socialist Bernie Sanders. Senator Sander’s voting block is comprised of YOUR children and grand children. Together, these two entities, in the works for about a half-century, have created the biggest story of this political season, the one that never made its way into your considered consciousness, that is, until now.
 Napoleon, Anthony, (2012), The Progressive Virus: The epidemic infecting America. VBW Publishing, College Station, Texas.
 Ezra Taft Benson claims to have heard it in person during Khrushchev's 1959 visit to the United States. Later, Benson contradicts himself and claims it was something Khrushchev had said several months before coming the United States. Benson also claimed it might not have been Khrushchev's exact words, but it summarized "in substance" Khrushchev's position.
 Napoleon, Anthony, (2012), The Progressive Virus: The epidemic infecting America. VBW Publishing, College Station, Texas.
 Napoleon, Anthony; Yevtushenkov, Yevgeni, (2013), A Look Inside the Playbook: How Marxists Plan to Destroy America. VBW Publishing, College Station, Texas.